平淡是真——啃啃不老阁

搜索发起人：
泉站 marslady

搜索缘由：
发信人: marslady (淡然||路在脚下), 信区: kingster
标  题: Re: [版大]域名注册完毕，娃哈哈
发信站: 复旦泉 (2007年09月18日20:41:23 星期二), 站内信件

555555555555555555555555
帮我找几篇范文来吧...题目是GMAT ISSUE 37

"Since science and technology are becoming more aid more essential to modern
society, schools should devote more time to teaching science and technology
and less to teaching the arts and humanities."

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated
above. Support your views with reasons and or examples from your own
experience, observations, or reading.


搜索过程：
大汗啊，这题目，是辩论性质的。。。。。。。。
先英翻中
人文vs科学
中文理解，初始，德先生vs赛先生
文章搜索，没什么有价值的
更改关键字 科学 人文 辩论
找到些文章，可以指导有些思路
更改关键字，e文的
science vs humanities debate
搜索N篇，
找到一篇
http://space.mit.edu/~dd/ECON/two_cultures.html
贴一段开头吧，我觉得写的还不错哦
里面还提到了图灵，汗啊

Summary

In his recent work "Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge"[1], E.O. Wilson notes that not only does the gap between the two cultures of the Sciences and the Humanities described by C.P. Snow in 1959[2] continue to exist today, but that its very origin is unexplained. In this essay I describe a possible (scientific!) explanation for the existence of these two cultures.

Briefly, the Sciences seek to understand the physical world and, from a human perspective, this is a study of our human "hardware." Amazingly, this hardware is complex enough to support self-conscious thought. But, just as a general purpose computer can run a variety of programs[3], our human hardware allows us to "run" a huge range of individual and collective "cultural software"[4]. The Humanities, then, focus on the cultural creations of human beings; these creations cover a huge range and are central to our experience as human beings, yet they are not derivable from and only loosely constrained by the properties of our hardware.

This view suggests a mariage of the two cultures which recognizes each of their strengths and limitations. Scientists may retain their claims to the objectivity of their results regarding the physical world but might adopt some humility by recognizing the large contribution to their success that is due to the extraordinary "model-ability" of the physical world itself, as opposed to the strength of the scientific process per se. Humanists would do well to understand, acknowledge and incorporate the results of science where appropriate and relevant. On the other hand, the Humanities may properly declare that much of their domain transcends scientific criteria of truth[5], that it is fundamentally subjective, and yet that it is ultimately what is most important to our lives as human beings[6].

搜索结果：
good
个人感觉还不错，哈哈

搜索总结：
中文，e文，关键字啊，
这个还是重点，啥时候有自然语言搜索引擎啊